The Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) in Delhi has reversed its September directive instructing sub-registrars not to register any new property that doesn’t comply with the Unified Building Bye Laws of 2016. This decision follows a meeting convened by Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena at Raj Niwas, where he urged RERA and relevant officials to reassess the order due to widespread complaints from individuals facing difficulties in registering their land and flats.
RERA Withdraws Its New Rule for Buildings Construction
The initial order issued on September 9, had created a significant hindrance in the registration process, prompting concerns from various stakeholders. During the meeting Saxena engaged with RERA Chairman, members, the Chief Secretary and the Divisional Commissioner to discuss the ramifications of the directive. The Lieutenant Governor had been receiving representations and complaints from public representatives, including MPs, MLAs and municipal councillors as well as civil society organizations highlighting the registration challenges faced by individuals.
Over the past week, the registration process at sub-registrar offices had come to a standstill, with only DDA flats and plots, wills and rent agreements being registered. This halt not only posed challenges for the public particularly the middle and lower income groups but also impacted government revenue collection according to an official statement. Land and sale deeds’ registration, a significant revenue source for the government faced disruptions affecting both citizens and the exchequer.
The decision to withdraw the order came after careful consideration of the feedback and complaints received. The reversal aims to address the impasse in property registrations and mitigate the impact on both citizens and the government’s financial interests. Saxena emphasized the importance of the registration process, stating that it is a vital revenue source for the government and essential for citizens especially those in the middle and lower income brackets.
The situation had triggered a domino effect with multiple sectors being affected including real estate legal documentation and revenue collection. The move to lift the ban on non compliant property registrations aligns with the need to strike a balance between regulatory compliance and ensuring the smooth functioning of essential processes that contribute to public welfare and government finances.
In conclusion the decision to withdraw the order reflects a responsive approach to citizen concerns and aims to restore normalcy in property registration processes while safeguarding revenue streams for the government.